Files
Hugo/content/blog/rust-error-handling.md
T

96 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown

---
title: "Rust Error Handling: From unwrap to anyhow"
date: 2026-05-16T13:00:00+08:00
draft: false
description: "The journey from panic-driven development to proper error types. When to use thiserror for library crates and anyhow for applications."
tags:
- Rust
- Error Handling
- Programming
---
Rust forces you to think about errors. Starting with `unwrap()` everywhere is fine for prototypes, but production code needs proper error types.
## Stage 1: The Unwrap Phase
```rust
let config = read_config().unwrap();
let db = connect(&config).unwrap();
let result = query(&db).unwrap();
```
Every Rust beginner goes through this. It's fine for scripts and prototypes — if something fails, the panic message with a line number is good enough. The problem starts when you need graceful error handling or meaningful error messages for users.
## Stage 2: Box<dyn Error>
The quick upgrade path:
```rust
fn do_thing() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
let config = read_config()?;
let db = connect(&config)?;
query(&db)?;
Ok(())
}
```
The `?` operator works with any error type that implements `From<T>`. `Box<dyn Error>` catches everything. But you lose type information — the caller can't match on specific error variants.
## Stage 3: Proper Error Types with thiserror
For libraries, define explicit error types:
```rust
use thiserror::Error;
#[derive(Error, Debug)]
pub enum AppError {
#[error("configuration error: {0}")]
Config(String),
#[error("database error: {0}")]
Database(#[from] sqlx::Error),
#[error("not found: {0}")]
NotFound(String),
}
```
The `#[from]` attribute auto-implements `From<T>`, so `?` works seamlessly. Callers can match on variants:
```rust
match do_thing().await {
Err(AppError::NotFound(id)) => { /* handle 404 */ }
Err(e) => { /* log and return 500 */ }
Ok(data) => { /* success */ }
}
```
## Stage 4: Application Errors with anyhow
For binaries, `anyhow` provides flexible error handling without the ceremony:
```rust
use anyhow::{Context, Result};
fn main() -> Result<()> {
let config = read_config()
.with_context(|| "failed to read config file")?;
let db = connect(&config)
.context("database connection failed")?;
Ok(())
}
```
`context()` and `with_context()` attach human-readable messages at each fallible step. The error output is a chain of contexts, making debugging straightforward.
## The Ecosystem Split
| Crate | Use Case | Key Feature |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| `thiserror` | Library crates | Derive macro, typed errors |
| `anyhow` | Application binaries | Context chains, easy `?` |
| `eyre` | Applications (alternative) | Colorful error reports, custom hooks |
The ecosystem has settled on this pragmatic split: **thiserror for libraries, anyhow for binaries**. Libraries expose typed errors so callers can react programmatically; applications benefit from rich, human-readable error chains.
Remember: `unwrap()` and `expect()` still have their place — in tests, in examples, and when an invariant violation truly merits a panic. But for production code paths, make errors part of your type signature.